Hi Stephan,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 05:30:39PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 07:08:12PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 07:27:25PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 06:10:17PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > > > At the m
Hi Maxime,
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 07:08:12PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 07:27:25PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 06:10:17PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > > At the moment, video mode parameters like video=540x960,reflect_x,
> > > (without
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 07:27:25PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 06:10:17PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > At the moment, video mode parameters like video=540x960,reflect_x,
> > (without rotation set) are not taken into account when applying the
> > mode in drm_client_mod
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 06:10:17PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> At the moment, video mode parameters like video=540x960,reflect_x,
> (without rotation set) are not taken into account when applying the
> mode in drm_client_modeset.c.
A rotation value without exactly one rotation angle is illegal
At the moment, video mode parameters like video=540x960,reflect_x,
(without rotation set) are not taken into account when applying the
mode in drm_client_modeset.c.
One of the reasons for this is that the calculation that
combines the panel_orientation with cmdline->rotation_reflection
does not ha