[PATCH v2] drm/i915: clarify reasoning for the access_ok call

2013-03-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:37:35PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > This clarifies the comment above the access_ok check so a missing > VERIFY_READ doesn't alarm anyone. > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > Cc: Daniel Vetter > --- > v2: > - rewrote comment, thanks to Chris Wilson Queued for -next, thanks f

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: clarify reasoning for the access_ok call

2013-03-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:37:35PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > This clarifies the comment above the access_ok check so a missing > VERIFY_READ doesn't alarm anyone. > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > Cc: Daniel Vetter > --- > v2: > - rewrote comment, thanks to Chris Wilson Queued for -next, thanks f

[PATCH v2] drm/i915: clarify reasoning for the access_ok call

2013-03-11 Thread Kees Cook
This clarifies the comment above the access_ok check so a missing VERIFY_READ doesn't alarm anyone. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Cc: Daniel Vetter --- v2: - rewrote comment, thanks to Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c |6 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 dele

[PATCH v2] drm/i915: clarify reasoning for the access_ok call

2013-03-11 Thread Kees Cook
This clarifies the comment above the access_ok check so a missing VERIFY_READ doesn't alarm anyone. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Cc: Daniel Vetter --- v2: - rewrote comment, thanks to Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c |6 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 dele