On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 09:47:17AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2019, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > Something that I completely missed when implementing the new MST VCPI
> > atomic helpers is that with those helpers, there's technically a chance
> > of us having to grab additional modeset lo
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Something that I completely missed when implementing the new MST VCPI
> atomic helpers is that with those helpers, there's technically a chance
> of us having to grab additional modeset locks in ->compute_config() and
> furthermore, that means we have the p
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 03:08:00PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Something that I completely missed when implementing the new MST VCPI
> atomic helpers is that with those helpers, there's technically a chance
> of us having to grab additional modeset locks in ->compute_config() and
> furthermore, that
Something that I completely missed when implementing the new MST VCPI
atomic helpers is that with those helpers, there's technically a chance
of us having to grab additional modeset locks in ->compute_config() and
furthermore, that means we have the potential to hit a normal modeset
deadlock. Howev
