On 2025-08-25 6:00 a.m., Andi Shyti wrote:
Hi Zhanjun,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_irq.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_irq.c
index 75e802e10be2..21804eec8320 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_irq.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @
Hi Zhanjun,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_irq.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_irq.c
> index 75e802e10be2..21804eec8320 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_irq.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
>
> static void guc_irq_handl
Boolean flag access from interrupt context might have synchronous issueis
on multiple processor platform, flags modified by one core might be read
as an old value by another core. This issue on interrupt enable flag might
causes interrupt misses or leakage.
Change the interrupts.enable type to atom