On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Ken Adams wrote:
>
> On 6/27/14 8:56 PM, "Ben Skeggs" wrote:
>
>>On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Ken Adams wrote:
>>> quick note re: tegra and gpu bars...
>>>
>>> to this point we've explicitly avoided providing user-mode mappings due
>>>to
>>> power management
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Ken Adams wrote:
> quick note re: tegra and gpu bars...
>
> to this point we've explicitly avoided providing user-mode mappings due to
> power management issues, etc.
> looks to me like this would allow such mappings. is that the case? are
> there any paths which
GK20A's BAR is functionally identical to NVC0's, but do not support
being ioremapped write-combined. Create a BAR instance for GK20A that
reflect that state.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot
---
Changes since v1:
- Fix compilation warning due to missing cast
Patch 1 of the series was ok and thus
On 6/27/14 8:56 PM, "Ben Skeggs" wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Ken Adams wrote:
>> quick note re: tegra and gpu bars...
>>
>> to this point we've explicitly avoided providing user-mode mappings due
>>to
>> power management issues, etc.
>> looks to me like this would allow such mappin
quick note re: tegra and gpu bars...
to this point we've explicitly avoided providing user-mode mappings due to
power management issues, etc.
looks to me like this would allow such mappings. is that the case? are
there any paths which would require such mappings to function properly?
thanks
---
