[PATCH v2] drm/gem: add mutex lock when using drm_gem_mmap_obj

2013-06-27 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 27-06-13 01:39, Seung-Woo Kim schreef: > From: YoungJun Cho > > The drm_gem_mmap_obj() has to be protected with dev->struct_mutex, > but some caller functions do not. So it adds mutex lock to missing > callers and adds assertion to check whether drm_gem_mmap_obj() is > called with mutex lock or

[PATCH v2] drm/gem: add mutex lock when using drm_gem_mmap_obj

2013-06-27 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi, On Thursday 27 June 2013 08:39:58 Seung-Woo Kim wrote: > From: YoungJun Cho > > The drm_gem_mmap_obj() has to be protected with dev->struct_mutex, > but some caller functions do not. So it adds mutex lock to missing > callers and adds assertion to check whether drm_gem_mmap_obj() is > calle

[PATCH v2] drm/gem: add mutex lock when using drm_gem_mmap_obj

2013-06-27 Thread Rob Clark
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Seung-Woo Kim wrote: > From: YoungJun Cho > > The drm_gem_mmap_obj() has to be protected with dev->struct_mutex, > but some caller functions do not. So it adds mutex lock to missing > callers and adds assertion to check whether drm_gem_mmap_obj() is > called with

[PATCH v2] drm/gem: add mutex lock when using drm_gem_mmap_obj

2013-06-27 Thread Seung-Woo Kim
From: YoungJun Cho The drm_gem_mmap_obj() has to be protected with dev->struct_mutex, but some caller functions do not. So it adds mutex lock to missing callers and adds assertion to check whether drm_gem_mmap_obj() is called with mutex lock or not. Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho Signed-off-by: Se

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/gem: add mutex lock when using drm_gem_mmap_obj

2013-06-27 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 27-06-13 01:39, Seung-Woo Kim schreef: > From: YoungJun Cho > > The drm_gem_mmap_obj() has to be protected with dev->struct_mutex, > but some caller functions do not. So it adds mutex lock to missing > callers and adds assertion to check whether drm_gem_mmap_obj() is > called with mutex lock or

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/gem: add mutex lock when using drm_gem_mmap_obj

2013-06-27 Thread Rob Clark
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Seung-Woo Kim wrote: > From: YoungJun Cho > > The drm_gem_mmap_obj() has to be protected with dev->struct_mutex, > but some caller functions do not. So it adds mutex lock to missing > callers and adds assertion to check whether drm_gem_mmap_obj() is > called with

[PATCH v2] drm/gem: add mutex lock when using drm_gem_mmap_obj

2013-06-27 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 27-06-13 01:39, Seung-Woo Kim schreef: > From: YoungJun Cho > > The drm_gem_mmap_obj() has to be protected with dev->struct_mutex, > but some caller functions do not. So it adds mutex lock to missing > callers and adds assertion to check whether drm_gem_mmap_obj() is > called with mutex lock or

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/gem: add mutex lock when using drm_gem_mmap_obj

2013-06-27 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi, On Thursday 27 June 2013 08:39:58 Seung-Woo Kim wrote: > From: YoungJun Cho > > The drm_gem_mmap_obj() has to be protected with dev->struct_mutex, > but some caller functions do not. So it adds mutex lock to missing > callers and adds assertion to check whether drm_gem_mmap_obj() is > calle

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/gem: add mutex lock when using drm_gem_mmap_obj

2013-06-26 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 27-06-13 01:39, Seung-Woo Kim schreef: > From: YoungJun Cho > > The drm_gem_mmap_obj() has to be protected with dev->struct_mutex, > but some caller functions do not. So it adds mutex lock to missing > callers and adds assertion to check whether drm_gem_mmap_obj() is > called with mutex lock or

[PATCH v2] drm/gem: add mutex lock when using drm_gem_mmap_obj

2013-06-26 Thread Seung-Woo Kim
From: YoungJun Cho The drm_gem_mmap_obj() has to be protected with dev->struct_mutex, but some caller functions do not. So it adds mutex lock to missing callers and adds assertion to check whether drm_gem_mmap_obj() is called with mutex lock or not. Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho Signed-off-by: Se