Hello Tobias,
Sorry for late reply.
On 06/14/2017 09:30 PM, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
Hello Hoegeun,
my last question (does this regress the case "node required, but
absent") still stands.
Hoegeun Kwon wrote:
Remove the error handling of bridge_node because the bridge_node is
required optionally
Hello Hoegeun,
my last question (does this regress the case "node required, but
absent") still stands.
Hoegeun Kwon wrote:
> Remove the error handling of bridge_node because the bridge_node is
> required optionally.
I don't think a construction like that exists. Either it's required, or
it's opt
Remove the error handling of bridge_node because the bridge_node is
required optionally.
For example, In case of Exynos SoC, a bridge device such as mDNIe and
MIC could be placed between Display Controller and MIPI DSI device but
the bridge device is required optionally.
Signed-off-by: Hoegeun Kw
