On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 at 11:25, Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 at 20:19, Christopher Obbard
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dmitry,
> >
> > On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 at 17:40, Dmitry Baryshkov
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 27/03/2025 19:25, Christopher Obbard wrote:
> > > > According to the eDP specifi
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 at 20:19, Christopher Obbard
wrote:
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 at 17:40, Dmitry Baryshkov
> wrote:
> >
> > On 27/03/2025 19:25, Christopher Obbard wrote:
> > > According to the eDP specification (e.g., VESA eDP 1.4b, section
> > > 3.3.10.2),
> > > if DP_EDP_PWMGEN
Hi Dmitry,
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 at 17:40, Dmitry Baryshkov
wrote:
>
> On 27/03/2025 19:25, Christopher Obbard wrote:
> > According to the eDP specification (e.g., VESA eDP 1.4b, section 3.3.10.2),
> > if DP_EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT is less than DP_EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT_CAP_MIN,
> > the sink is required
On 27/03/2025 19:25, Christopher Obbard wrote:
According to the eDP specification (e.g., VESA eDP 1.4b, section 3.3.10.2),
if DP_EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT is less than DP_EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT_CAP_MIN,
the sink is required to use the MIN value as the effective bit count.
Some eDP panels report DP_EDP_
According to the eDP specification (e.g., VESA eDP 1.4b, section 3.3.10.2),
if DP_EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT is less than DP_EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT_CAP_MIN,
the sink is required to use the MIN value as the effective bit count.
Some eDP panels report DP_EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT as 0 while still providing
valid