Re: [PATCH v2] drm/dp: Clarify that wait_hpd_asserted() is not optional for panels

2024-03-26 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 3:45 PM Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 at 22:58, Douglas Anderson wrote: > > > > In response to my patch removing the "wait for HPD" logic at the > > beginning of the MSM DP transfer() callback [1], we had some debate > > about what the "This is an op

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/dp: Clarify that wait_hpd_asserted() is not optional for panels

2024-03-19 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 at 22:58, Douglas Anderson wrote: > > In response to my patch removing the "wait for HPD" logic at the > beginning of the MSM DP transfer() callback [1], we had some debate > about what the "This is an optional function" meant in the > documentation of the wait_hpd_asserted() c

[PATCH v2] drm/dp: Clarify that wait_hpd_asserted() is not optional for panels

2024-03-19 Thread Douglas Anderson
In response to my patch removing the "wait for HPD" logic at the beginning of the MSM DP transfer() callback [1], we had some debate about what the "This is an optional function" meant in the documentation of the wait_hpd_asserted() callback. Let's clarify. As talked about in the MSM DP patch [1],