On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 12:27:15PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 at 11:20, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 11:49:07AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> > > On 2024/11/1 00:23, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:06:38PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wro
On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 at 11:20, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 11:49:07AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> >
> > On 2024/11/1 00:23, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:06:38PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> > >
> > >> But I think Johan do need more times to understand
On 24-10-31 17:33:35, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 06:13:45PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > On 24-10-31 15:05:52, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 09:23:24AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 03:49:34PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
>
> > > > > Cc
On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 11:49:07AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
>
> On 2024/11/1 00:23, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:06:38PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> >
> >> But I think Johan do need more times to understand what exactly
> >> the real problem is. We do need times to investi
On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 11:49:07AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> On 2024/11/1 00:23, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:06:38PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> >
> >> But I think Johan do need more times to understand what exactly
> >> the real problem is. We do need times to investigat
On 2024/10/31 20:31, Neil Armstrong wrote:
On 30/10/2024 15:49, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
Hi,
On 2024/10/21 21:08, Neil Armstrong wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:49:34 +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
The assignment of the of_node to the aux bridge needs to mark the
of_node as reused as well, otherwise
On 2024/11/1 00:23, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:06:38PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
But I think Johan do need more times to understand what exactly
the real problem is. We do need times to investigate new method.
No, I know perfectly well what the (immediate) problem is her
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:06:38PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> But I think Johan do need more times to understand what exactly
> the real problem is. We do need times to investigate new method.
No, I know perfectly well what the (immediate) problem is here (I was
the one adding support for the o
Hi, Dears maintainers
On 2024/10/31 20:31, Neil Armstrong wrote:
On 30/10/2024 15:49, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
Hi,
On 2024/10/21 21:08, Neil Armstrong wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:49:34 +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
The assignment of the of_node to the aux bridge needs to mark the
of_node as reus
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 05:48:24PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 10:23, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 03:49:34PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > > The assignment of the of_node to the aux bridge needs to mark the
> > > of_node as reused as well, otherwis
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 06:13:45PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On 24-10-31 15:05:52, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 09:23:24AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 03:49:34PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > > > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # 6.8
>
> > > I assume
On 24-10-31 15:05:52, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 09:23:24AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 03:49:34PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > > The assignment of the of_node to the aux bridge needs to mark the
> > > of_node as reused as well, otherwise resource provid
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 10:23, Johan Hovold wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 03:49:34PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > The assignment of the of_node to the aux bridge needs to mark the
> > of_node as reused as well, otherwise resource providers like pinctrl will
> > report a gpio as already requeste
Hi,
On 2024/10/31 22:02, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 01:31:47PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
On 30/10/2024 15:49, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
On 2024/10/21 21:08, Neil Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:49:34 +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
The assignment of the of_node to the aux bridg
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 09:23:24AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 03:49:34PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > The assignment of the of_node to the aux bridge needs to mark the
> > of_node as reused as well, otherwise resource providers like pinctrl will
> > report a gpio as already
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 01:31:47PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> On 30/10/2024 15:49, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> > On 2024/10/21 21:08, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> >> On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:49:34 +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> >>> The assignment of the of_node to the aux bridge needs to mark the
> >>> of_node a
On 30/10/2024 15:49, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
Hi,
On 2024/10/21 21:08, Neil Armstrong wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:49:34 +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
The assignment of the of_node to the aux bridge needs to mark the
of_node as reused as well, otherwise resource providers like pinctrl will
report a
On 30/10/2024 17:45, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
Hi,
On 2024/10/18 23:43, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 03:49:34PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
The assignment of the of_node to the aux bridge needs to mark the
of_node as reused as well, otherwise resource providers like pinctrl will
repor
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 12:45:24AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2024/10/18 23:43, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 03:49:34PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> >> The assignment of the of_node to the aux bridge needs to mark the
> >> of_node as reused as well, otherwise resou
Hi,
On 2024/10/18 23:43, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 03:49:34PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
The assignment of the of_node to the aux bridge needs to mark the
of_node as reused as well, otherwise resource providers like pinctrl will
report a gpio as already requested by a differe
Hi,
On 2024/10/21 21:08, Neil Armstrong wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:49:34 +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
The assignment of the of_node to the aux bridge needs to mark the
of_node as reused as well, otherwise resource providers like pinctrl will
report a gpio as already requested by a different
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:49:34 +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> The assignment of the of_node to the aux bridge needs to mark the
> of_node as reused as well, otherwise resource providers like pinctrl will
> report a gpio as already requested by a different device when both pinconf
> and gpios property
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 03:49:34PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> The assignment of the of_node to the aux bridge needs to mark the
> of_node as reused as well, otherwise resource providers like pinctrl will
> report a gpio as already requested by a different device when both pinconf
> and gpios propert
On 18/10/2024 14:49, Abel Vesa wrote:
The assignment of the of_node to the aux bridge needs to mark the
of_node as reused as well, otherwise resource providers like pinctrl will
report a gpio as already requested by a different device when both pinconf
and gpios property are present.
Fix that by
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 03:49:34PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> The assignment of the of_node to the aux bridge needs to mark the
> of_node as reused as well, otherwise resource providers like pinctrl will
> report a gpio as already requested by a different device when both pinconf
> and gpios propert
The assignment of the of_node to the aux bridge needs to mark the
of_node as reused as well, otherwise resource providers like pinctrl will
report a gpio as already requested by a different device when both pinconf
and gpios property are present.
Fix that by using the device_set_of_node_from_dev()
26 matches
Mail list logo
