On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 10:14 AM Harry Wentland wrote:
>
> On 2019-12-02 4:47 p.m., Thomas Anderson wrote:
> > For high-res (8K) or HFR (4K120) displays, using uncompressed pixel
> > formats like YCbCr444 would exceed the bandwidth of HDMI 2.0, so the
> > "interesting" modes would be disabled, leav
On 2019-12-02 4:47 p.m., Thomas Anderson wrote:
> For high-res (8K) or HFR (4K120) displays, using uncompressed pixel
> formats like YCbCr444 would exceed the bandwidth of HDMI 2.0, so the
> "interesting" modes would be disabled, leaving only low-res or low
> framerate modes.
>
> This change lower
Ping. Is there any action required to get this landed?
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:59:24AM -0800, Tom Anderson wrote:
> Friendly ping.
>
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 01:47:13PM -0800, Thomas Anderson wrote:
> > For high-res (8K) or HFR (4K120) displays, using uncompressed pixel
> > formats like YCbC
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 10:10 AM Tom Anderson wrote:
>
> Ping. Is there any action required to get this landed?
Looks good to me, but I'd like to hear from the display guys.
Alex
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:59:24AM -0800, Tom Anderson wrote:
> > Friendly ping.
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019
For high-res (8K) or HFR (4K120) displays, using uncompressed pixel
formats like YCbCr444 would exceed the bandwidth of HDMI 2.0, so the
"interesting" modes would be disabled, leaving only low-res or low
framerate modes.
This change lowers the pixel encoding to 4:2:2 or 4:2:0 if the max TMDS
clock
