Re: (subset) [PATCH v2] backlight: lp8788: Drop support for platform data

2024-04-11 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 12:35:28 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > The backlight driver supports getting passed platform data. However this > isn't used. This allows to remove quite some dead code from the driver > because bl->pdata is always NULL, and so bl->mode is always > LP8788_BL_REGISTER_ONLY. >

Re: [PATCH v2] backlight: lp8788: Drop support for platform data

2024-03-27 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > The backlight driver supports getting passed platform data. However this > isn't used. This allows to remove quite some dead code from the driver > because bl->pdata is always NULL, and so bl->mode is always > LP8788_BL_REGISTER_ONLY. > > Signed-off-

Re: [PATCH v2] backlight: lp8788: Drop support for platform data

2024-03-22 Thread Daniel Thompson
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 12:35:28PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > The backlight driver supports getting passed platform data. However this > isn't used. This allows to remove quite some dead code from the driver > because bl->pdata is always NULL, and so bl->mode is always > LP8788_BL_REGISTER_ON

[PATCH v2] backlight: lp8788: Drop support for platform data

2024-03-14 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
The backlight driver supports getting passed platform data. However this isn't used. This allows to remove quite some dead code from the driver because bl->pdata is always NULL, and so bl->mode is always LP8788_BL_REGISTER_ONLY. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König --- Changes since (implicit) v1 arch