Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] misc: fastrpc: Move all remote heap allocations to a new list

2025-06-12 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On 12/06/2025 08:13, Ekansh Gupta wrote: On 5/22/2025 5:39 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2025 at 07:54, Ekansh Gupta wrote: On 5/19/2025 6:59 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 04:36:13PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: On 5/19/2025 3:46 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrot

Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] misc: fastrpc: Move all remote heap allocations to a new list

2025-06-11 Thread Ekansh Gupta
On 5/22/2025 5:39 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Thu, 22 May 2025 at 07:54, Ekansh Gupta > wrote: >> >> >> On 5/19/2025 6:59 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 04:36:13PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: On 5/19/2025 3:46 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2

Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] misc: fastrpc: Move all remote heap allocations to a new list

2025-05-22 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On Thu, 22 May 2025 at 07:54, Ekansh Gupta wrote: > > > > On 5/19/2025 6:59 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 04:36:13PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: > >> > >> On 5/19/2025 3:46 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > >>> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 09:58:22AM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: > >>

Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] misc: fastrpc: Move all remote heap allocations to a new list

2025-05-21 Thread Ekansh Gupta
On 5/19/2025 5:05 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > On 5/13/25 05:28, Ekansh Gupta wrote: >> Remote heap allocations are not organized in a maintainable manner, >> leading to potential issues with memory management. As the remote >> heap allocations are maintained in fl mmaps list, the allocation

Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] misc: fastrpc: Move all remote heap allocations to a new list

2025-05-21 Thread Ekansh Gupta
On 5/19/2025 6:59 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 04:36:13PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: >> >> On 5/19/2025 3:46 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 09:58:22AM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: Remote heap allocations are not organized in a maintainable man

Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] misc: fastrpc: Move all remote heap allocations to a new list

2025-05-19 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 04:36:13PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: > > > On 5/19/2025 3:46 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 09:58:22AM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: > >> Remote heap allocations are not organized in a maintainable manner, > >> leading to potential issues with memory

Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] misc: fastrpc: Move all remote heap allocations to a new list

2025-05-19 Thread Srinivas Kandagatla
On 5/13/25 05:28, Ekansh Gupta wrote: > Remote heap allocations are not organized in a maintainable manner, > leading to potential issues with memory management. As the remote > heap allocations are maintained in fl mmaps list, the allocations > will go away if the audio daemon process is killed bu

Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] misc: fastrpc: Move all remote heap allocations to a new list

2025-05-19 Thread Ekansh Gupta
On 5/19/2025 3:46 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 09:58:22AM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: >> Remote heap allocations are not organized in a maintainable manner, >> leading to potential issues with memory management. As the remote > Which issues? I think I have been asking thi

Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] misc: fastrpc: Move all remote heap allocations to a new list

2025-05-19 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 09:58:22AM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: > Remote heap allocations are not organized in a maintainable manner, > leading to potential issues with memory management. As the remote Which issues? I think I have been asking this question previously. Please expand the commit messag

[PATCH v1 2/5] misc: fastrpc: Move all remote heap allocations to a new list

2025-05-12 Thread Ekansh Gupta
Remote heap allocations are not organized in a maintainable manner, leading to potential issues with memory management. As the remote heap allocations are maintained in fl mmaps list, the allocations will go away if the audio daemon process is killed but there are chances that audio PD might still