Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] drm/bridge: ps8640 and ti-sn65dsi86 updates

2022-06-22 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Kieran, On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:07:26AM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote: > Hi Sam, > > Quoting Sam Ravnborg (2022-02-06 19:09:11) > > > > > > The code builds - but needs testing. > > > > Hrmff, no it does not build. The fixes was by accident not included. > > Will wait a bit for feedback befo

Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] drm/bridge: ps8640 and ti-sn65dsi86 updates

2022-06-22 Thread Kieran Bingham
Hi Sam, Quoting Sam Ravnborg (2022-02-06 19:09:11) > > > > The code builds - but needs testing. > > Hrmff, no it does not build. The fixes was by accident not included. > Will wait a bit for feedback before posting a v2. > > Sam Do you have any plan to send a v2 on this series? I have

Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] drm/bridge: ps8640 and ti-sn65dsi86 updates

2022-02-06 Thread Sam Ravnborg
> > The code builds - but needs testing. Hrmff, no it does not build. The fixes was by accident not included. Will wait a bit for feedback before posting a v2. Sam

[PATCH v1 0/9] drm/bridge: ps8640 and ti-sn65dsi86 updates

2022-02-06 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Add a new macro DRM_BRIDGE_STATE_OPS that can be used to assign atomic_reset and atomic_{duplicate,destroy}_state to the default implementations. They will be valid in most cases. Add a drm variant of media-bus-format.h to hold a single function to get the bpc from the bus format. Also add a smal