Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] DRM: add LTDC support for STM32F4

2017-01-19 Thread Yannick FERTRE
Hi Neil, ST may use this hardware IP also in other SoC, even that is not true now, I hope that "st" is a more futur proof name. Best regards Yannick Fertré On 01/16/2017 05:02 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote: > On 01/16/2017 02:28 PM, Yannick Fertre wrote: >> The purpose of this set of patches is to

Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] DRM: add LTDC support for STM32F4

2017-01-16 Thread Neil Armstrong
On 01/16/2017 02:28 PM, Yannick Fertre wrote: > The purpose of this set of patches is to add a new driver for stm32f429. > This driver was developed and tested on evaluation board stm32429i. > > Stm32f4 is a MCU platform which don't have MMU so the last patches developed > by Benjamin Gaignard reg

[PATCH v1 0/7] DRM: add LTDC support for STM32F4

2017-01-16 Thread Yannick Fertre
The purpose of this set of patches is to add a new driver for stm32f429. This driver was developed and tested on evaluation board stm32429i. Stm32f4 is a MCU platform which don't have MMU so the last patches developed by Benjamin Gaignard regarding "DRM: allow to use mmuless devices" are necessary

[PATCH v1 0/7] DRM: add LTDC support for STM32F4

2017-01-16 Thread Yannick Fertre
The purpose of this set of patches is to add a new driver for stm32f429. This driver was developed and tested on evaluation board stm32429i. Stm32f4 is a MCU platform which don't have MMU so the last patches developed by Benjamin Gaignard regarding "DRM: allow to use mmuless devices" are necessary

[PATCH v1 0/7] DRM: add LTDC support for STM32F4

2017-01-10 Thread Yannick Fertre
The purpose of this set of patches is to add a new driver for stm32f429. This driver was developed and tested on evaluation board stm32429i. Stm32f4 is a MCU platform which don't have MMU so the last patches developed by Benjamin Gaignard regarding "DRM: allow to use mmuless devices" are necessary