On 4/3/24 4:30 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:25PM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's series
>> to fix drivers/i2c[1], fix th
On 4/3/2024 8:54 AM, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
>
> On 4/3/24 4:30 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:25PM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
>>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:25PM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's series
> to fix drivers/i2c[1], fix the terminology where I had a role to play, now
>
I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's series
to fix drivers/i2c[1], fix the terminology where I had a role to play, now that
the approved verbiage exists in the specification.
Compile tested, no
