On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, David Laight wrote:
> From: Jani Nikula
>> Sent: 26 February 2024 09:28
>>
>> On Sun, 25 Feb 2024, David Laight wrote:
>> > The wrapper just adds two more lines of error output when the test fails.
>>
>> There are only a handful of places in kernel code that use
>> _Static_
From: Jani Nikula
> Sent: 26 February 2024 09:28
>
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2024, David Laight wrote:
> > The wrapper just adds two more lines of error output when the test fails.
>
> There are only a handful of places in kernel code that use
> _Static_assert() directly. Nearly 900 instances of static_a
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024, David Laight wrote:
> The wrapper just adds two more lines of error output when the test fails.
There are only a handful of places in kernel code that use
_Static_assert() directly. Nearly 900 instances of static_assert().
Are we now saying it's fine to use _Static_assert()
The wrapper just adds two more lines of error output when the test fails.
Signed-off-by: David Laight
---
include/linux/minmax.h | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Changes for v2:
- Typographical and spelling corrections to the commit messages.
Patches unchanged.
d
