[PATCH libdrm 4/5] xf86drm: introduce drmGetDevice[s]2

2016-12-02 Thread Emil Velikov
From: Emil Velikov Relative to the original version, here one can provide a flags bitmask. Currently only DRM_DEVICE_IGNORE_PCI_REVISION is supported. Implementation detail: If it's set, we will only parse the separate sysfs files and we won't touch the config one. The latter awakes the device (

[PATCH libdrm 4/5] xf86drm: introduce drmGetDevice[s]2

2016-12-01 Thread Emil Velikov
On 1 December 2016 at 03:56, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On 01/12/16 12:09 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> On 01/12/16 05:35 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: >>> From: Emil Velikov >>> >>> Relative to the original version, here one can provide a flags bitmask. >>> Currently only DRM_DEVICE_IGNORE_PCI_REVISION is

[PATCH libdrm 4/5] xf86drm: introduce drmGetDevice[s]2

2016-12-01 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 01/12/16 12:09 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On 01/12/16 05:35 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: >> From: Emil Velikov >> >> Relative to the original version, here one can provide a flags bitmask. >> Currently only DRM_DEVICE_IGNORE_PCI_REVISION is supported. >> >> Implementation detail: >> If it's set, we

[PATCH libdrm 4/5] xf86drm: introduce drmGetDevice[s]2

2016-12-01 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 01/12/16 05:35 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: > From: Emil Velikov > > Relative to the original version, here one can provide a flags bitmask. > Currently only DRM_DEVICE_IGNORE_PCI_REVISION is supported. > > Implementation detail: > If it's set, we will only parse the separate sysfs files and we wo

[PATCH libdrm 4/5] xf86drm: introduce drmGetDevice[s]2

2016-11-30 Thread Emil Velikov
From: Emil Velikov Relative to the original version, here one can provide a flags bitmask. Currently only DRM_DEVICE_IGNORE_PCI_REVISION is supported. Implementation detail: If it's set, we will only parse the separate sysfs files and we won't touch the config one. The latter awakes the device (