On 10/04/15 06:05, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Emil Velikov writes:
>
>> Humble ping.
>>
>> Eric, can you please confirm if this and the follow up patch look ok.
>
> Seems reasonable if you've verified the symbols aren't exposed.
>
Neither the dri modules (i9[16]5_dri.so) nor libdrm_intel exports thes
Emil Velikov writes:
> Humble ping.
>
> Eric, can you please confirm if this and the follow up patch look ok.
Seems reasonable if you've verified the symbols aren't exposed.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-si
Humble ping.
Eric, can you please confirm if this and the follow up patch look ok.
Thanks
Emil
On 1 April 2015 at 17:15, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Added with commit 57b4c4c32d3(Move the renaming of mm.c symbols to
> symbol duplication/collision with ones that are available elsewhere.
>
> As the pub
Added with commit 57b4c4c32d3(Move the renaming of mm.c symbols to
symbol duplication/collision with ones that are available elsewhere.
As the public/private symbols of libdrm are properly annotated neither
one of the symbols will end up in the global name-space, thus should no
longer be required.
