[PATCH libdrm 0/5] Yet another round of Android build cleanups

2015-03-20 Thread Emil Velikov
On 20/03/15 06:34, Chih-Wei Huang wrote: > Is there any gating item to prevent > these patches (5+2) from being merged? > None in particular. I prefer to give it a day or two as people might want to comment, yet their mail queue does not allow them. I've pushed them now. Thanks ! Emil

[PATCH libdrm 0/5] Yet another round of Android build cleanups

2015-03-20 Thread Chih-Wei Huang
Is there any gating item to prevent these patches (5+2) from being merged? 2015-03-19 10:56 GMT+08:00 Chih-Wei Huang : > 2015-03-19 10:06 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov : >> On 18/03/15 16:38, Chih-Wei Huang wrote: >>> 2015-03-18 9:37 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov : > On 18 March 2015 at 01:19, Chih-Wei Hua

[PATCH libdrm 0/5] Yet another round of Android build cleanups

2015-03-19 Thread Chih-Wei Huang
2015-03-19 10:06 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov : > On 18/03/15 16:38, Chih-Wei Huang wrote: >> 2015-03-18 9:37 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov : >>> > On 18 March 2015 at 01:19, Chih-Wei Huang >>> > wrote: >> >> I would suggest to remove all the use of LIBDRM_TOP. >> Do you want me to submit a pat

[PATCH libdrm 0/5] Yet another round of Android build cleanups

2015-03-19 Thread Emil Velikov
On 18/03/15 16:38, Chih-Wei Huang wrote: > 2015-03-18 9:37 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov : >> > On 18 March 2015 at 01:19, Chih-Wei Huang >> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> I would suggest to remove all the use of LIBDRM_TOP. >>> >> Do you want me to submit a patch? >> > Hmm I'm not sure that things will work co

[PATCH libdrm 0/5] Yet another round of Android build cleanups

2015-03-19 Thread Chih-Wei Huang
2015-03-18 9:37 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov : > On 18 March 2015 at 01:19, Chih-Wei Huang wrote: >> >> I would suggest to remove all the use of LIBDRM_TOP. >> Do you want me to submit a patch? > Hmm I'm not sure that things will work correctly if we directly > substitute LIBDRM_TOP with LOCAL_PATH with

[PATCH libdrm 0/5] Yet another round of Android build cleanups

2015-03-18 Thread Chih-Wei Huang
2015-03-18 7:30 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov : > > As pointed out by Chih-Wei, Android's LOCAL_COPY_HEADERS{,_TO} has been > depreciated for quite some time. > > Although it was a convenient way of getting things done (no more > hard-coding the location of drm) it seems that there is another more > appro

[PATCH libdrm 0/5] Yet another round of Android build cleanups

2015-03-18 Thread Emil Velikov
On 18 March 2015 at 01:19, Chih-Wei Huang wrote: > 2015-03-18 7:30 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov : >> >> As pointed out by Chih-Wei, Android's LOCAL_COPY_HEADERS{,_TO} has been >> depreciated for quite some time. >> >> Although it was a convenient way of getting things done (no more >> hard-coding the lo

[PATCH libdrm 0/5] Yet another round of Android build cleanups

2015-03-17 Thread Emil Velikov
Hi all, As pointed out by Chih-Wei, Android's LOCAL_COPY_HEADERS{,_TO} has been depreciated for quite some time. Although it was a convenient way of getting things done (no more hard-coding the location of drm) it seems that there is another more appropriate (and cleaner) solution. Namely: Ann