On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:06:09PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 18 July 2015 at 22:20, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > As far as I can tell no OpenBSD platform ever used 81
> > for a drm major. While the value was added to libdrm in 2003
> > or earlier drm didn't appear in OpenBSD till 2007.
> >
> >
On 20 July 2015 at 17:15, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:06:09PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 18 July 2015 at 22:20, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>> > As far as I can tell no OpenBSD platform ever used 81
>> > for a drm major. While the value was added to libdrm in 2003
>> > or ea
On 18 July 2015 at 22:20, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> As far as I can tell no OpenBSD platform ever used 81
> for a drm major. While the value was added to libdrm in 2003
> or earlier drm didn't appear in OpenBSD till 2007.
>
> Of the OpenBSD platforms that support drm amd64/macppc/sparc64
> use a maj
As far as I can tell no OpenBSD platform ever used 81
for a drm major. While the value was added to libdrm in 2003
or earlier drm didn't appear in OpenBSD till 2007.
Of the OpenBSD platforms that support drm amd64/macppc/sparc64
use a major of 87, i386 uses 88.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Gray
---
