On 5 September 2017 at 05:23, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>> From: Dave Airlie
>>>
>>> This adds kernel semaphore support to the command submission
>>> interface in what should be a backwards comp
On 2 September 2017 at 01:36, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> From: Dave Airlie
>>
>> This adds kernel semaphore support to the command submission
>> interface in what should be a backwards compatible manner,
>> it adds a new command submission API.
>>
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> From: Dave Airlie
>>
>> This adds kernel semaphore support to the command submission
>> interface in what should be a backwards compatible manner,
>> it adds a new command submission API.
>
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> This adds kernel semaphore support to the command submission
> interface in what should be a backwards compatible manner,
> it adds a new command submission API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
> ---
> amdgpu/amdgpu.h
On 18/07/17 09:55 PM, zhoucm1 wrote:
On 2017年07月18日 21:57, Christian König wrote:
Am 18.07.2017 um 04:29 schrieb zhoucm1:
On 2017年07月18日 01:35, Christian König wrote:
Am 17.07.2017 um 19:22 schrieb Marek Olšák:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Dave Airlie
wrote:
I can take a look at it, I j
On 2017年07月18日 21:57, Christian König wrote:
Am 18.07.2017 um 04:29 schrieb zhoucm1:
On 2017年07月18日 01:35, Christian König wrote:
Am 17.07.2017 um 19:22 schrieb Marek Olšák:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Dave Airlie
wrote:
I can take a look at it, I just won't have time until next wee
Hi Dave,
If you just add "get" functions for what you need from amdgpu objects,
that should be fine.
Marek
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 18 July 2017 at 03:02, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 17.07.2017 um 05:36 schrieb Dave Airlie:
I can take a look at it, I
Am 18.07.2017 um 04:29 schrieb zhoucm1:
On 2017年07月18日 01:35, Christian König wrote:
Am 17.07.2017 um 19:22 schrieb Marek Olšák:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Dave Airlie
wrote:
I can take a look at it, I just won't have time until next week
most likely.
I've taken a look, and it's see
On 2017年07月18日 01:35, Christian König wrote:
Am 17.07.2017 um 19:22 schrieb Marek Olšák:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
I can take a look at it, I just won't have time until next week
most likely.
I've taken a look, and it's seemingly more complicated than I'm
expectin
On 18 July 2017 at 03:02, Christian König wrote:
> Am 17.07.2017 um 05:36 schrieb Dave Airlie:
>>>
>>> I can take a look at it, I just won't have time until next week most
>>> likely.
>>
>> I've taken a look, and it's seemingly more complicated than I'm
>> expecting I'd want to land in Mesa before
Am 17.07.2017 um 19:22 schrieb Marek Olšák:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
I can take a look at it, I just won't have time until next week most likely.
I've taken a look, and it's seemingly more complicated than I'm
expecting I'd want to land in Mesa before 17.2 ships, I'
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> I can take a look at it, I just won't have time until next week most likely.
>
> I've taken a look, and it's seemingly more complicated than I'm
> expecting I'd want to land in Mesa before 17.2 ships, I'd really
> prefer to just push the n
Am 17.07.2017 um 05:36 schrieb Dave Airlie:
I can take a look at it, I just won't have time until next week most likely.
I've taken a look, and it's seemingly more complicated than I'm
expecting I'd want to land in Mesa before 17.2 ships, I'd really
prefer to just push the new libdrm_amdgpu api
>
> I can take a look at it, I just won't have time until next week most likely.
I've taken a look, and it's seemingly more complicated than I'm
expecting I'd want to land in Mesa before 17.2 ships, I'd really
prefer to just push the new libdrm_amdgpu api from this patch. If I
have to port all the
On 12 July 2017 at 03:47, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> On 11 July 2017 at 18:36, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 11.07.2017 um 08:49 schrieb Dave Airlie:
On 7 July 2017 at 19:07, Christian König wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> on f
On 11 July 2017 at 19:32, Christian König wrote:
> Am 11.07.2017 um 11:20 schrieb Dave Airlie:
>>
>> On 11 July 2017 at 18:36, Christian König wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 11.07.2017 um 08:49 schrieb Dave Airlie:
On 7 July 2017 at 19:07, Christian König
wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 11 July 2017 at 18:36, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 11.07.2017 um 08:49 schrieb Dave Airlie:
>>>
>>> On 7 July 2017 at 19:07, Christian König wrote:
Hi Dave,
on first glance that looks rather good to me, but there is o
Am 11.07.2017 um 11:20 schrieb Dave Airlie:
On 11 July 2017 at 18:36, Christian König wrote:
Am 11.07.2017 um 08:49 schrieb Dave Airlie:
On 7 July 2017 at 19:07, Christian König wrote:
Hi Dave,
on first glance that looks rather good to me, but there is one things I
don't really like and I s
On 11 July 2017 at 18:36, Christian König wrote:
> Am 11.07.2017 um 08:49 schrieb Dave Airlie:
>>
>> On 7 July 2017 at 19:07, Christian König wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> on first glance that looks rather good to me, but there is one things I
>>> don't really like and I strongly think Marek wi
Am 11.07.2017 um 08:49 schrieb Dave Airlie:
On 7 July 2017 at 19:07, Christian König wrote:
Hi Dave,
on first glance that looks rather good to me, but there is one things I
don't really like and I strongly think Marek will absolutely agree on that:
When we add a new CS function then let's get
On 7 July 2017 at 19:07, Christian König wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> on first glance that looks rather good to me, but there is one things I
> don't really like and I strongly think Marek will absolutely agree on that:
> When we add a new CS function then let's get ride of all this abstraction!
>
> The
Hi Dave,
on first glance that looks rather good to me, but there is one things I
don't really like and I strongly think Marek will absolutely agree on
that: When we add a new CS function then let's get ride of all this
abstraction!
The new function should get an amdgpu_device_handle and a li
Chrstian,
you are probably the best person to ack this, I'd like to get the radv
code landed
and allow the GL code to get going.
Dave.
> This adds kernel semaphore support to the command submission
> interface in what should be a backwards compatible manner,
> it adds a new command submission AP
From: Dave Airlie
This adds kernel semaphore support to the command submission
interface in what should be a backwards compatible manner,
it adds a new command submission API.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
---
amdgpu/amdgpu.h| 29 -
amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 118 ++
24 matches
Mail list logo
