On 27 January 2016 at 14:47, Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 02:08:21PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 27 January 2016 at 13:50, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 01:23:11PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> >> As some headers do not reside in include/drm we need to
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 02:08:21PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 27 January 2016 at 13:50, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 01:23:11PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
> >> As some headers do not reside in include/drm we need to tweak our rules,
> >> and exclude headers that shouldn't
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 01:23:11PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
> As some headers do not reside in include/drm we need to tweak our rules,
> and exclude headers that shouldn't be distributed [XXX: clarify why ?].
>
> To avoid the extra magic of diving into the kernel tree running `make
> headers_i
On 27 January 2016 at 13:50, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 01:23:11PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> As some headers do not reside in include/drm we need to tweak our rules,
>> and exclude headers that shouldn't be distributed [XXX: clarify why ?].
>>
>> To avoid the extra magic of
As some headers do not reside in include/drm we need to tweak our rules,
and exclude headers that shouldn't be distributed [XXX: clarify why ?].
To avoid the extra magic of diving into the kernel tree running `make
headers_install', just sed out the only reason why we need it - __user.
Cc: Alex
