On 8/8/23 09:21, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 18:52:20 +0200
Danilo Krummrich wrote:
When no custom lock is set to protect a GEMs GPUVA list, lockdep checks
should fall back to the GEM objects dma-resv lock. With the current
implementation we're setting the lock_dep_map of the GE
On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 18:52:20 +0200
Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> When no custom lock is set to protect a GEMs GPUVA list, lockdep checks
> should fall back to the GEM objects dma-resv lock. With the current
> implementation we're setting the lock_dep_map of the GEM objects 'resv'
> pointer (in case n
When no custom lock is set to protect a GEMs GPUVA list, lockdep checks
should fall back to the GEM objects dma-resv lock. With the current
implementation we're setting the lock_dep_map of the GEM objects 'resv'
pointer (in case no custom lock_dep_map is set yet) on
drm_gem_private_object_init().
