On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:29:13AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> On Monday 22 September 2014 09:40:38 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:27:13PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 17 September 2014 14:37:30 Ajay kumar wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 1
Hi Thierry,
On Monday 22 September 2014 09:40:38 Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:27:13PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 September 2014 14:37:30 Ajay kumar wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > Hi Ajay,
> > > >
> > > >
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:27:13PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Ajay,
>
> On Wednesday 17 September 2014 14:37:30 Ajay kumar wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > Hi Ajay,
> > >
> > > Thank you for the patch.
> > >
> > > I think we're moving in the rig
>>
>> Before the introduction of the component framework I would have said this is
>> the way to go. Now, I think bridges should register themselves as components,
>> and the DRM master driver should use the component framework to get a
>> reference to the bridges it needs.
> Well, I have modified
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Ajay,
>
> On Wednesday 17 September 2014 14:37:30 Ajay kumar wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > Hi Ajay,
>> >
>> > Thank you for the patch.
>> >
>> > I think we're moving in the right direction, but
Hi Laurent,
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Ajay,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> I think we're moving in the right direction, but we're not there yet.
>
> On Saturday 26 July 2014 00:52:08 Ajay Kumar wrote:
>> This patch tries to seperate drm_bridge implementation
Hi Ajay,
On Wednesday 17 September 2014 14:37:30 Ajay kumar wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Ajay,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch.
> >
> > I think we're moving in the right direction, but we're not there yet.
> >
> > On Saturday 26 July 2014 00:52:08 Aj
Hi Ajay,
Thank you for the patch.
I think we're moving in the right direction, but we're not there yet.
On Saturday 26 July 2014 00:52:08 Ajay Kumar wrote:
> This patch tries to seperate drm_bridge implementation
> into 2 parts, a drm part and a non_drm part.
>
> A set of helper functions are d
Hello Ajay,
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Ajay kumar wrote:
>>
>> Do you plan to address Thierry's concerns and re-spin this patch?
>>
>> Same question for patches:
>>
>> "drm/bridge: Add i2c based driver for ptn3460 bridge"
>> "drm/bridge: Add i2c based driver for ps8622/ps8625 bridge"
> Yes,
Hi Javier,
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> Hello Ajay,
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:33:28PM +0530, Ajay kumar wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Thierry Reding >> gmail.com> wrote:
>> [...]
Hello Ajay,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:33:28PM +0530, Ajay kumar wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Thierry Reding > gmail.com> wrote:
> [...]
>> > I think it should even be possible to do this in more separate steps.
>> > For exam
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:33:28PM +0530, Ajay kumar wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
[...]
> > I think it should even be possible to do this in more separate steps.
> > For example you could add the new bridge infrastructure without touching
> > any of the existi
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:01:44PM +0530, Ajay kumar wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Thierry Reding
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 12:52:08AM +0530, Ajay Kumar wrote:
>> >> This patch tries to seperate drm_bridge implemen
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 12:52:08AM +0530, Ajay Kumar wrote:
>> This patch tries to seperate drm_bridge implementation
>> into 2 parts, a drm part and a non_drm part.
>>
>> A set of helper functions are defined in this patch to make
>> bridge
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:01:44PM +0530, Ajay kumar wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 12:52:08AM +0530, Ajay Kumar wrote:
> >> This patch tries to seperate drm_bridge implementation
> >> into 2 parts, a drm part and a non_drm part.
> >>
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 12:52:08AM +0530, Ajay Kumar wrote:
> This patch tries to seperate drm_bridge implementation
> into 2 parts, a drm part and a non_drm part.
>
> A set of helper functions are defined in this patch to make
> bridge driver probe independent of the drm flow.
>
> The bridge dev
This patch tries to seperate drm_bridge implementation
into 2 parts, a drm part and a non_drm part.
A set of helper functions are defined in this patch to make
bridge driver probe independent of the drm flow.
The bridge devices register themselves on a lookup table
when they get probed by calling
17 matches
Mail list logo
