On 5/10/21 8:04 PM, Dave Stevenson wrote:
Hi,
[...]
+static void sn65dsi83_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
+{
+ struct sn65dsi83 *ctx = bridge_to_sn65dsi83(bridge);
+ unsigned int pval;
+ u16 val;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Clear reset, disable PLL */
+ regmap_write(
On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 12:16, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> On 5/10/21 11:58 AM, Dave Stevenson wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 21:26, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/7/21 2:48 PM, Dave Stevenson wrote:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> +static void sn65dsi83_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> >
On 5/10/21 11:58 AM, Dave Stevenson wrote:
On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 21:26, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 5/7/21 2:48 PM, Dave Stevenson wrote:
[...]
+static void sn65dsi83_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
+{
+ struct sn65dsi83 *ctx = bridge_to_sn65dsi83(bridge);
+ unsigned int pval;
+
On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 21:26, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> On 5/7/21 2:48 PM, Dave Stevenson wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> +static void sn65dsi83_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> >> +{
> >> + struct sn65dsi83 *ctx = bridge_to_sn65dsi83(bridge);
> >> + unsigned int pval;
> >> + u16 val;
> >
On 5/7/21 2:48 PM, Dave Stevenson wrote:
[...]
+static void sn65dsi83_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
+{
+ struct sn65dsi83 *ctx = bridge_to_sn65dsi83(bridge);
+ unsigned int pval;
+ u16 val;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Clear reset, disable PLL */
+ regmap_write(ctx-
On 5/7/21 11:17 AM, Dave Stevenson wrote:
On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 21:51, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 5/6/21 6:03 PM, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
On 06.05.21 17:46, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 5/6/21 5:38 PM, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
[...]
Works on i.MX8MM with SN65DSI84 and a single link LVDS display (1024x60
On Wed, 5 May 2021 at 11:03, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> Add driver for TI SN65DSI83 Single-link DSI to Single-link LVDS bridge
> and TI SN65DSI84 Single-link DSI to Dual-link or 2x Single-link LVDS
> bridge. TI SN65DSI85 is unsupported due to lack of hardware to test on,
> but easy to add.
>
> The dri
On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 21:51, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> On 5/6/21 6:03 PM, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> > On 06.05.21 17:46, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 5/6/21 5:38 PM, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>> Works on i.MX8MM with SN65DSI84 and a single link LVDS display (1024x600)
> >>> and from my per
On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 21:49, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> On 5/6/21 7:03 PM, Dave Stevenson wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 13:48, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/6/21 11:45 AM, Dave Stevenson wrote:
> >>> Hi Marek
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>> I'm taking an interest as there are a number of Raspberry Pi
On 5/6/21 6:03 PM, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
On 06.05.21 17:46, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 5/6/21 5:38 PM, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
[...]
Works on i.MX8MM with SN65DSI84 and a single link LVDS display (1024x600) and
from my perspective everything else also looks good. Thanks for your work!
I have two
On 5/6/21 7:03 PM, Dave Stevenson wrote:
On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 13:48, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 5/6/21 11:45 AM, Dave Stevenson wrote:
Hi Marek
Hi,
I'm taking an interest as there are a number of Raspberry Pi users
trying to get this chip up and running (not there quite yet).
A couple of fair
On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 13:48, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> On 5/6/21 11:45 AM, Dave Stevenson wrote:
> > Hi Marek
>
> Hi,
>
> > I'm taking an interest as there are a number of Raspberry Pi users
> > trying to get this chip up and running (not there quite yet).
> > A couple of fairly minor comments
>
> Is
On 06.05.21 17:46, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 5/6/21 5:38 PM, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> [...]
>> Works on i.MX8MM with SN65DSI84 and a single link LVDS display (1024x600)
>> and from my perspective everything else also looks good. Thanks for your
>> work!
>>
>> I have two remarks:
>>
>> 1. In my tes
On 5/6/21 5:38 PM, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
[...]
Works on i.MX8MM with SN65DSI84 and a single link LVDS display (1024x600) and
from my perspective everything else also looks good. Thanks for your work!
I have two remarks:
1. In my test I couldn't get it to work with four DSI lanes enabled (onl
On 05.05.21 12:02, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Add driver for TI SN65DSI83 Single-link DSI to Single-link LVDS bridge
> and TI SN65DSI84 Single-link DSI to Dual-link or 2x Single-link LVDS
> bridge. TI SN65DSI85 is unsupported due to lack of hardware to test on,
> but easy to add.
>
> The driver operates
On 5/6/21 3:03 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Marek,
Hi,
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 02:48:11PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 5/6/21 11:45 AM, Dave Stevenson wrote:
Hi Marek
Hi,
I'm taking an interest as there are a number of Raspberry Pi users
trying to get this chip up and running (not the
Hi Marek,
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 02:48:11PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 5/6/21 11:45 AM, Dave Stevenson wrote:
> > Hi Marek
>
> Hi,
>
> > I'm taking an interest as there are a number of Raspberry Pi users
> > trying to get this chip up and running (not there quite yet).
> > A couple of fairl
On 5/6/21 11:45 AM, Dave Stevenson wrote:
Hi Marek
Hi,
I'm taking an interest as there are a number of Raspberry Pi users
trying to get this chip up and running (not there quite yet).
A couple of fairly minor comments
Is there any readily available display unit / expansion board with this
Hi Marek
I'm taking an interest as there are a number of Raspberry Pi users
trying to get this chip up and running (not there quite yet).
A couple of fairly minor comments
On Wed, 5 May 2021 at 11:03, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> Add driver for TI SN65DSI83 Single-link DSI to Single-link LVDS bridge
>
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 12:03 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
> Add driver for TI SN65DSI83 Single-link DSI to Single-link LVDS bridge
> and TI SN65DSI84 Single-link DSI to Dual-link or 2x Single-link LVDS
> bridge. TI SN65DSI85 is unsupported due to lack of hardware to test on,
> but easy to add.
>
> The d
Add driver for TI SN65DSI83 Single-link DSI to Single-link LVDS bridge
and TI SN65DSI84 Single-link DSI to Dual-link or 2x Single-link LVDS
bridge. TI SN65DSI85 is unsupported due to lack of hardware to test on,
but easy to add.
The driver operates the chip via I2C bus. Currently the LVDS clock ar
21 matches
Mail list logo
