On 22. 7. 4. 21:07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Make dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() accept a NULL terminated list of names
> instead of making the callers keep the two parameters in sync, which
> creates an opportunity for bugs to get in.
>
> Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
On 05/07/2022 05:34, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 04-07-22, 15:35, Steven Price wrote:
>> I have to say the 'new improved' list ending with NULL approach doesn't
>> work out so well for Panfrost. We already have to have a separate
>> 'num_supplies' variable for devm_regulator_bulk_get() /
>> regulator_
On 04-07-22, 15:35, Steven Price wrote:
> I have to say the 'new improved' list ending with NULL approach doesn't
> work out so well for Panfrost. We already have to have a separate
> 'num_supplies' variable for devm_regulator_bulk_get() /
> regulator_bulk_{en,dis}able(), so the keeping everything
Make dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() accept a NULL terminated list of names
instead of making the callers keep the two parameters in sync, which
creates an opportunity for bugs to get in.
Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c|
On 04/07/2022 13:07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Make dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() accept a NULL terminated list of names
> instead of making the callers keep the two parameters in sync, which
> creates an opportunity for bugs to get in.
>
> Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
