On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 11:07:37PM -0300, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
> On 07/16, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:57:18PM -0300, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
> > > On 07/10, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 10:55:14PM -0300, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
> > > > > Currently
On 07/16, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:57:18PM -0300, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
> > On 07/10, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 10:55:14PM -0300, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
> > > > Currently, vkms only work with enabled VBlank. This patch adds another
> > > > operat
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:57:18PM -0300, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
> On 07/10, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 10:55:14PM -0300, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
> > > Currently, vkms only work with enabled VBlank. This patch adds another
> > > operation model that allows vkms to work withou
On 07/10, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 10:55:14PM -0300, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
> > Currently, vkms only work with enabled VBlank. This patch adds another
> > operation model that allows vkms to work without VBlank support. In this
> > scenario, vblank signaling is faked by calli
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 10:55:14PM -0300, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
> Currently, vkms only work with enabled VBlank. This patch adds another
> operation model that allows vkms to work without VBlank support. In this
> scenario, vblank signaling is faked by calling drm_send_vblank_event()
> in vkms_cr
Currently, vkms only work with enabled VBlank. This patch adds another
operation model that allows vkms to work without VBlank support. In this
scenario, vblank signaling is faked by calling drm_send_vblank_event()
in vkms_crtc_atomic_flush(); this approach works due to the
drm_vblank_get() == 0 ch
