On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:19:31 -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
> In the process of adding support for shared IRQ pins, a scenario
> was accidentally created where adv7511_irq_process returned
> prematurely causing the EDID to fail randomly.
>
> Since the interrupt handler is broken up into two main helper f
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 5:19 PM Adam Ford wrote:
>
> In the process of adding support for shared IRQ pins, a scenario
> was accidentally created where adv7511_irq_process returned
> prematurely causing the EDID to fail randomly.
>
> Since the interrupt handler is broken up into two main helper fun
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 05:19:31PM GMT, Adam Ford wrote:
> In the process of adding support for shared IRQ pins, a scenario
> was accidentally created where adv7511_irq_process returned
> prematurely causing the EDID to fail randomly.
>
> Since the interrupt handler is broken up into two main help
In the process of adding support for shared IRQ pins, a scenario
was accidentally created where adv7511_irq_process returned
prematurely causing the EDID to fail randomly.
Since the interrupt handler is broken up into two main helper functions,
update both of them to treat the helper functions as