Re: [PATCH RFT 10/14] drm/msm/a6xx: Stop tracking macrotile_mode (again)

2025-05-09 Thread Connor Abbott
On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 8:45 AM Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > On 5/8/25 8:33 PM, Connor Abbott wrote: > > On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 2:14 PM Konrad Dybcio wrote: > >> > >> From: Konrad Dybcio > >> > >> SC8180X (A680) and SA8775P (A663) require a write to that register, > >> while other SKUs are fine with

Re: [PATCH RFT 10/14] drm/msm/a6xx: Stop tracking macrotile_mode (again)

2025-05-09 Thread Konrad Dybcio
On 5/8/25 8:33 PM, Connor Abbott wrote: > On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 2:14 PM Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> >> From: Konrad Dybcio >> >> SC8180X (A680) and SA8775P (A663) require a write to that register, >> while other SKUs are fine with the default value. Don't overwrite it >> needlessly, requiring the de

Re: [PATCH RFT 10/14] drm/msm/a6xx: Stop tracking macrotile_mode (again)

2025-05-08 Thread Connor Abbott
On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 2:14 PM Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > From: Konrad Dybcio > > SC8180X (A680) and SA8775P (A663) require a write to that register, > while other SKUs are fine with the default value. Don't overwrite it > needlessly, requiring the developer to read the value back from > hardware j

[PATCH RFT 10/14] drm/msm/a6xx: Stop tracking macrotile_mode (again)

2025-05-08 Thread Konrad Dybcio
From: Konrad Dybcio SC8180X (A680) and SA8775P (A663) require a write to that register, while other SKUs are fine with the default value. Don't overwrite it needlessly, requiring the developer to read the value back from hardware just to put it in the driver again, introducing much more room for