Hi Jean-Fran?ois,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Thursday 27 March 2014 12:34:49 Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 18:33:09 +0100 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > That could work in your case, but I don't really like that.
> >
> > We need to describe the hardware topology, that might be
Hi Laurent,
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 18:33:09 +0100
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> That could work in your case, but I don't really like that.
>
> We need to describe the hardware topology, that might be the only point we
> all
> agree on. There are various hardware topologies we need to support with
Hi Jean-Fran?ois,
On Tuesday 25 March 2014 16:55:48 Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 23:39:01 +0100 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 21 March 2014 09:17:32 Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> > > The 'slave encoder' structure of the tda998x driver asks for glue
> > > between the DRM
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 23:39:01 +0100
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Jean-Fran?ois,
Hi Laurent,
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Friday 21 March 2014 09:17:32 Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> > The 'slave encoder' structure of the tda998x driver asks for glue
> > between the DRM driver and the encoder
Hi Jean-Fran?ois,
Thank you for the patch.
On Friday 21 March 2014 09:17:32 Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> The 'slave encoder' structure of the tda998x driver asks for glue
> between the DRM driver and the encoder/connector structures.
>
> This patch changes the driver to a normal DRM encoder/conn
The 'slave encoder' structure of the tda998x driver asks for glue
between the DRM driver and the encoder/connector structures.
This patch changes the driver to a normal DRM encoder/connector
thanks to the infrastructure for componentised subsystems.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine
---
driver
