[PATCH RFC 5/8] drm/i2c: nxp-tda998x: fix npix/nline programming

2013-06-09 Thread Sebastian Hesselbarth
On 06/09/2013 09:32 PM, Russell King wrote: > The npix/nline registers are supposed to be programmed with the total > number of pixels/lines, not the displayed pixels/lines, and not minus > one either. > > Signed-off-by: Russell King > --- Russell, Rob, I have patches fixing TDA998x sync generati

[PATCH RFC 5/8] drm/i2c: nxp-tda998x: fix npix/nline programming

2013-06-09 Thread Russell King
The npix/nline registers are supposed to be programmed with the total number of pixels/lines, not the displayed pixels/lines, and not minus one either. Signed-off-by: Russell King --- drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/dr

Re: [PATCH RFC 5/8] drm/i2c: nxp-tda998x: fix npix/nline programming

2013-06-09 Thread Sebastian Hesselbarth
On 06/09/2013 09:32 PM, Russell King wrote: The npix/nline registers are supposed to be programmed with the total number of pixels/lines, not the displayed pixels/lines, and not minus one either. Signed-off-by: Russell King --- Russell, Rob, I have patches fixing TDA998x sync generation for p

[PATCH RFC 5/8] drm/i2c: nxp-tda998x: fix npix/nline programming

2013-06-09 Thread Russell King
The npix/nline registers are supposed to be programmed with the total number of pixels/lines, not the displayed pixels/lines, and not minus one either. Signed-off-by: Russell King --- drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/dr