[PATCH RFC 0/3] Make "ti,tilcdc,slave" DT binding more sensible

2015-01-14 Thread Jyri Sarha
On 01/14/2015 08:57 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:12:25 +0200 > Jyri Sarha wrote: > >> These patches are needed for Beaglebone-back HDMI audio. There is no >> direct dependency between these patches and the other (dts and ASoC) >> changes needed for the HDMI audio so thes

[PATCH RFC 0/3] Make "ti,tilcdc,slave" DT binding more sensible

2015-01-14 Thread Jean-Francois Moine
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:12:25 +0200 Jyri Sarha wrote: > These patches are needed for Beaglebone-back HDMI audio. There is no > direct dependency between these patches and the other (dts and ASoC) > changes needed for the HDMI audio so these changes can be merged > independently. I also feel that t

[PATCH RFC 0/3] Make "ti,tilcdc,slave" DT binding more sensible

2015-01-13 Thread Jyri Sarha
These patches are needed for Beaglebone-back HDMI audio. There is no direct dependency between these patches and the other (dts and ASoC) changes needed for the HDMI audio so these changes can be merged independently. I also feel that these changes make sense even without the HDMI audio. Best rega