On Thursday, October 7th, 2021 at 10:10, Hans de Goede
wrote:
> > I think my order of favourites is:
> > 1. RMFB flag
> > 2. ioctl to set an existing FB as persistent
> > 3. ADDFB flag
> >
> > They all seem workable to me.
>
> I fully agree with the above.
Thanks for the feedback! It seems l
Hi,
On 10/7/21 9:45 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 21:24:44 +0200
> Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 5:19 PM Simon Ser wrote:
>>> This new ADDFB2 flag allows callers to mark a framebuffer as
>>> "persistent", and no longer have RMFB semantics when the DRM
>>> fil
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 21:24:44 +0200
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 5:19 PM Simon Ser wrote:
> > This new ADDFB2 flag allows callers to mark a framebuffer as
> > "persistent", and no longer have RMFB semantics when the DRM
> > file is closed.
> >
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-
On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 5:19 PM Simon Ser wrote:
> This new ADDFB2 flag allows callers to mark a framebuffer as
> "persistent", and no longer have RMFB semantics when the DRM
> file is closed.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/YTJypepF1Hpc2YYT@reader/
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Ser
> Cc: Ha
This new ADDFB2 flag allows callers to mark a framebuffer as
"persistent", and no longer have RMFB semantics when the DRM
file is closed.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/YTJypepF1Hpc2YYT@reader/
Signed-off-by: Simon Ser
Cc: Hans de Goede
Cc: Dennis Filder
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Pekka Pa
