On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 3:34 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:33 PM Qiujun Huang wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 1:02 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 03:18:23PM +0800, Qiujun Huang wrote:
> > > > We should hold idr_mutex for idr_alloc.
> >
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:33 PM Qiujun Huang wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 1:02 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 03:18:23PM +0800, Qiujun Huang wrote:
> > > We should hold idr_mutex for idr_alloc.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Qiujun Huang
> >
> > I've not seen the firs
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 1:02 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 03:18:23PM +0800, Qiujun Huang wrote:
> > We should hold idr_mutex for idr_alloc.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Qiujun Huang
>
> I've not seen the first version of this anywhere in my inbox, not sure
> where that got lost.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 03:18:23PM +0800, Qiujun Huang wrote:
> We should hold idr_mutex for idr_alloc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qiujun Huang
I've not seen the first version of this anywhere in my inbox, not sure
where that got lost.
Anyway, this seems like a false positive - I'm assuming this was ca
We should hold idr_mutex for idr_alloc.
Signed-off-by: Qiujun Huang
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c | 9 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c
index b481caf..427ee21 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease