Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm/panfrost: Explicitly clean up panfrost fence

2024-10-17 Thread Christian König
Am 16.10.24 um 18:43 schrieb Adrián Larumbe: On 16.10.2024 15:12, Christian König wrote: Am 15.10.24 um 01:31 schrieb Adrián Larumbe: Doesn't make any functional difference because generic dma_fence is the first panfrost_fence structure member, but I guess it doesn't hurt either. As discussed

Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm/panfrost: Explicitly clean up panfrost fence

2024-10-16 Thread Adrián Larumbe
On 16.10.2024 15:12, Christian König wrote: > Am 15.10.24 um 01:31 schrieb Adrián Larumbe: > > Doesn't make any functional difference because generic dma_fence is the > > first panfrost_fence structure member, but I guess it doesn't hurt either. > > As discussed with Sima we want to push into the

Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm/panfrost: Explicitly clean up panfrost fence

2024-10-16 Thread Christian König
Am 15.10.24 um 01:31 schrieb Adrián Larumbe: Doesn't make any functional difference because generic dma_fence is the first panfrost_fence structure member, but I guess it doesn't hurt either. As discussed with Sima we want to push into the exactly opposite direction because that requires that

[PATCH 9/9] drm/panfrost: Explicitly clean up panfrost fence

2024-10-14 Thread Adrián Larumbe
Doesn't make any functional difference because generic dma_fence is the first panfrost_fence structure member, but I guess it doesn't hurt either. Signed-off-by: Adrián Larumbe --- drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/p