Russell,
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Russell King
wrote:
> We never set the ratio for CTS/N calculation for the audio clock
> regenerator (ACR) to anything but 100, so this adds pointless
> complexity. Should we support pixel repetition, we should update the
> CTS/N calculation code to use t
We never set the ratio for CTS/N calculation for the audio clock
regenerator (ACR) to anything but 100, so this adds pointless
complexity. Should we support pixel repetition, we should update the
CTS/N calculation code to use those parameters or the actual TMDS clock
rate instead of a ratio.
Sign
