[PATCH 7/9] drm: Extract drm_property.[hc]

2016-08-29 Thread Daniel Vetter
This just contains the base property classes and all the code to handle blobs. I think for any kind of standardized/shared properties it's better to have separate files - this is fairly big already as-is. v2: resurrect misplaced hunk (Daniel Stone) Cc: Daniel Stone Reviewed-by: Archit Taneja Si

[PATCH 7/9] drm: Extract drm_property.[hc]

2016-08-25 Thread Archit Taneja
On 08/18/2016 02:26 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > This just contains the base property classes and all the code to > handle blobs. I think for any kind of standardized/shared properties > it's better to have separate files - this is fairly big already as-is. > > v2: resurrect misplaced hunk (Daniel

[PATCH 7/9] drm: Extract drm_property.[hc]

2016-08-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:11:35PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On 17 August 2016 at 21:56, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/include/drm/drm_property.h > > > +#ifndef __DRM_PROPERTY_H__ > > +#define __DRM_PROPERTY_H__ > > + > > +#include > > +#include > > +#inclu

[PATCH 7/9] drm: Extract drm_property.[hc]

2016-08-18 Thread Emil Velikov
Hi Daniel, On 17 August 2016 at 21:56, Daniel Vetter wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/drm/drm_property.h > +#ifndef __DRM_PROPERTY_H__ > +#define __DRM_PROPERTY_H__ > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > + Add the following fwd declaration since we use a pointer to the said struct ?

[PATCH 7/9] drm: Extract drm_property.[hc]

2016-08-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
This just contains the base property classes and all the code to handle blobs. I think for any kind of standardized/shared properties it's better to have separate files - this is fairly big already as-is. v2: resurrect misplaced hunk (Daniel Stone) Cc: Daniel Stone Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter