On 11.09.2012 18:12, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Christian K?nig
> wrote:
>> It is unnecessary when we remove the va in drm_close.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
> NAK there is case for which drm_close is not call like ib pool and
> other iirc. This clear va is
On 11.09.2012 18:12, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Christian König
wrote:
It is unnecessary when we remove the va in drm_close.
Signed-off-by: Christian König
NAK there is case for which drm_close is not call like ib pool and
other iirc. This clear va is really a saf
It is unnecessary when we remove the va in drm_close.
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c | 11 ---
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
index 8d23b7e..d210fe
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Christian K?nig
wrote:
> It is unnecessary when we remove the va in drm_close.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
NAK there is case for which drm_close is not call like ib pool and
other iirc. This clear va is really a safety net.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeo
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Christian König
wrote:
> It is unnecessary when we remove the va in drm_close.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König
NAK there is case for which drm_close is not call like ib pool and
other iirc. This clear va is really a safety net.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeo
It is unnecessary when we remove the va in drm_close.
Signed-off-by: Christian König
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c | 11 ---
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
index 8d23b7e..d210fe
