[PATCH 7/7] drm: Resurrect atomic rmfb code

2016-12-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 09:46:59AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 09-12-16 om 21:59 schreef Daniel Vetter: > > On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 03:19:44PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> This was somehow lost between v3 and the merged version in Maarten's > >> patch merged as: > >> > >> commit f2d580

[PATCH 7/7] drm: Resurrect atomic rmfb code

2016-12-12 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 09-12-16 om 21:59 schreef Daniel Vetter: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 03:19:44PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> This was somehow lost between v3 and the merged version in Maarten's >> patch merged as: >> >> commit f2d580b9a8149735cbc4b59c4a8df60173658140 >> Author: Maarten Lankhorst >> Date: Wed

[PATCH 7/7] drm: Resurrect atomic rmfb code

2016-12-09 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 03:19:44PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > This was somehow lost between v3 and the merged version in Maarten's > patch merged as: > > commit f2d580b9a8149735cbc4b59c4a8df60173658140 > Author: Maarten Lankhorst > Date: Wed May 4 14:38:26 2016 +0200 > > drm/core: Do no

[PATCH 7/7] drm: Resurrect atomic rmfb code

2016-12-09 Thread Daniel Vetter
This was somehow lost between v3 and the merged version in Maarten's patch merged as: commit f2d580b9a8149735cbc4b59c4a8df60173658140 Author: Maarten Lankhorst Date: Wed May 4 14:38:26 2016 +0200 drm/core: Do not preserve framebuffer on rmfb, v4. Actual code copied from Maarten's patch, b