On 15.07.25 15:56, Simona Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 03:43:08PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>> We are about to revert this patch. Not sure if backporting it makes sense at
>> the moment.
>
> I think it still makes sense, at least as an interim fix.
>
> What I discussed with Thomas
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 03:43:08PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> We are about to revert this patch. Not sure if backporting it makes sense at
> the moment.
I think it still makes sense, at least as an interim fix.
What I discussed with Thomas is that first we want to revert back from
gem_bo->d
We are about to revert this patch. Not sure if backporting it makes sense at
the moment.
Regards,
Christian.
On 15.07.25 15:13, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 6.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> --
>
> From: Thomas Zimmermann
>
> comm
6.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Thomas Zimmermann
commit 5307dce878d4126e1b375587318955bd019c3741 upstream.
A GEM handle can be released while the GEM buffer object is attached
to a DRM framebuffer. This leads to the release
