On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 10:00 AM Thomas Hellström
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 7/22/21 11:59 AM, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 10:49, Matthew Auld
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 at 21:11, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 8:35 AM Matthew Auld
> >>> wrote:
>
Hi,
On 7/22/21 11:59 AM, Matthew Auld wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 10:49, Matthew Auld
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 at 21:11, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 8:35 AM Matthew Auld
wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 20:49, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 1:45 PM Matth
On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 10:49, Matthew Auld
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 at 21:11, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 8:35 AM Matthew Auld
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 20:49, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 1:45 PM Matthew Auld
On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 at 21:11, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 8:35 AM Matthew Auld
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 20:49, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 1:45 PM Matthew Auld
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 18:39, Jason Eks
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 10:11 PM Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 8:35 AM Matthew Auld
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 20:49, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 1:45 PM Matthew Auld
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 18:39, Jason
Whenever we had a user object (n_placements > 0), we were ignoring
obj->mm.region and always putting obj->placements[0] as the requested
region. For LMEM+SMEM objects, this was causing them to get shoved into
LMEM on every i915_ttm_get_pages() even when SMEM was requested by, say,
i915_gem_object_
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 8:35 AM Matthew Auld
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 20:49, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 1:45 PM Matthew Auld
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 18:39, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 11:00 AM Matthew Au
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 20:49, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 1:45 PM Matthew Auld
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 18:39, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 11:00 AM Matthew Auld
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 16:52, Matthew
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 1:45 PM Matthew Auld
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 18:39, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 11:00 AM Matthew Auld
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 16:52, Matthew Auld
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 15:10, Jason Ek
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 15:14, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> Whenever we had a user object (n_placements > 0), we were ignoring
> obj->mm.region and always putting obj->placements[0] as the requested
> region. For LMEM+SMEM objects, this was causing them to get shoved into
> LMEM on every i915_ttm_get
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 18:39, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 11:00 AM Matthew Auld
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 16:52, Matthew Auld
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 15:10, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 8:54 AM Matthew Au
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 11:00 AM Matthew Auld
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 16:52, Matthew Auld
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 15:10, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 8:54 AM Matthew Auld
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 at 23:39, Jason Ekst
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 16:52, Matthew Auld
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 15:10, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 8:54 AM Matthew Auld
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 at 23:39, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Whenever we had a user object (n_placements >
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 15:10, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 8:54 AM Matthew Auld
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 at 23:39, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > >
> > > Whenever we had a user object (n_placements > 0), we were ignoring
> > > obj->mm.region and always putting obj->pl
Whenever we had a user object (n_placements > 0), we were ignoring
obj->mm.region and always putting obj->placements[0] as the requested
region. For LMEM+SMEM objects, this was causing them to get shoved into
LMEM on every i915_ttm_get_pages() even when SMEM was requested by, say,
i915_gem_object_
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 8:54 AM Matthew Auld
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 at 23:39, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >
> > Whenever we had a user object (n_placements > 0), we were ignoring
> > obj->mm.region and always putting obj->placements[0] as the requested
> > region. For LMEM+SMEM objects, this
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 at 23:39, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> Whenever we had a user object (n_placements > 0), we were ignoring
> obj->mm.region and always putting obj->placements[0] as the requested
> region. For LMEM+SMEM objects, this was causing them to get shoved into
> LMEM on every i915_ttm_get
Whenever we had a user object (n_placements > 0), we were ignoring
obj->mm.region and always putting obj->placements[0] as the requested
region. For LMEM+SMEM objects, this was causing them to get shoved into
LMEM on every i915_ttm_get_pages() even when SMEM was requested by, say,
i915_gem_object_
18 matches
Mail list logo