Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Add stable memory region names

2023-09-26 Thread Iddamsetty, Aravind
On 26-09-2023 21:12, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 26/09/2023 16:29, Iddamsetty, Aravind wrote: >> On 22-09-2023 19:16, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin >>> >>> At the moment memory region names are a bit too varied and too >>> inconsistent to be used for ABI purposes, like for up

Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Add stable memory region names

2023-09-26 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 26/09/2023 16:29, Iddamsetty, Aravind wrote: On 22-09-2023 19:16, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: From: Tvrtko Ursulin At the moment memory region names are a bit too varied and too inconsistent to be used for ABI purposes, like for upcoming fdinfo memory stats. System memory can be either system

Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Add stable memory region names

2023-09-26 Thread Iddamsetty, Aravind
On 22-09-2023 19:16, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > At the moment memory region names are a bit too varied and too > inconsistent to be used for ABI purposes, like for upcoming fdinfo > memory stats. > > System memory can be either system or system-ttm. Local memory has the

[PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Add stable memory region names

2023-09-22 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin At the moment memory region names are a bit too varied and too inconsistent to be used for ABI purposes, like for upcoming fdinfo memory stats. System memory can be either system or system-ttm. Local memory has the instance number appended, others do not. Not only incosisten