On Mon, 04 Sep 2023 16:28:37 +0200, Maxim Schwalm wrote:
> On 28.08.23 17:59, Michael Tretter wrote:
> > Calculating the byte_clk in kHz is imprecise for a hs_clock of 55687500
> > Hz, which may be used with a pixel clock of 74.25 MHz with mode
> > 1920x1080-30.
> >
> > Fix the calculation by usin
Hi,
On 28.08.23 17:59, Michael Tretter wrote:
> Calculating the byte_clk in kHz is imprecise for a hs_clock of 55687500
> Hz, which may be used with a pixel clock of 74.25 MHz with mode
> 1920x1080-30.
>
> Fix the calculation by using HZ instead of kHZ.
>
> This requires to change the type to u6
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 10:59 AM Michael Tretter
wrote:
>
> Calculating the byte_clk in kHz is imprecise for a hs_clock of 55687500
> Hz, which may be used with a pixel clock of 74.25 MHz with mode
> 1920x1080-30.
>
> Fix the calculation by using HZ instead of kHZ.
>
> This requires to change the
Calculating the byte_clk in kHz is imprecise for a hs_clock of 55687500
Hz, which may be used with a pixel clock of 74.25 MHz with mode
1920x1080-30.
Fix the calculation by using HZ instead of kHZ.
This requires to change the type to u64 to prevent overflows of the
integer type.
Signed-off-by: M
