oh, whoops, this one is already on drm-next
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> Because, there is no reason for it not to be const.
>
> v1: original
> v2: fix compile break in vmwgfx, and couple related cleanups suggested
> by Ville Syrj?l?
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
> ---
>
Because, there is no reason for it not to be const.
v1: original
v2: fix compile break in vmwgfx, and couple related cleanups suggested
by Ville Syrj?l?
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
---
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c| 2 +-
drivers/gpu
oh, whoops, this one is already on drm-next
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> Because, there is no reason for it not to be const.
>
> v1: original
> v2: fix compile break in vmwgfx, and couple related cleanups suggested
> by Ville Syrjälä
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
> ---
>
Because, there is no reason for it not to be const.
v1: original
v2: fix compile break in vmwgfx, and couple related cleanups suggested
by Ville Syrjälä
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
---
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c| 2 +-
drivers/gpu