Hi Tvrtko,
On 18/03/25 12:54, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Since the query loop is using copy_to_user() to write out a single u64 at
a time it feels more natural (and is a tiny bit more compact) to replace
it with put_user().
Access_ok() check is added to the input checking for an early bailout in
cas
Since the query loop is using copy_to_user() to write out a single u64 at
a time it feels more natural (and is a tiny bit more compact) to replace
it with put_user().
Access_ok() check is added to the input checking for an early bailout in
case of a bad buffer passed in.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Urs
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Since the query loop is using copy_to_user() to write out a single u64 at
a time it feels more natural (and is a tiny bit more compact) to replace
it with put_user().
Access_ok() check is added to the input checking for an early bailout in
case of a bad buffer passed in.
Si
