On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 09:21:25AM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
> Quoting Jani Nikula (2025-01-24 08:50:14-03:00)
> >On Thu, 23 Jan 2025, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
> >> Quoting Jani Nikula (2025-01-23 12:14:31-03:00)
> >>>On Thu, 23 Jan 2025, Jani Nikula wrote:
> From: Gustavo Sousa
>
>
Quoting Jani Nikula (2025-01-24 08:50:14-03:00)
>On Thu, 23 Jan 2025, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
>> Quoting Jani Nikula (2025-01-23 12:14:31-03:00)
>>>On Thu, 23 Jan 2025, Jani Nikula wrote:
From: Gustavo Sousa
The header drm_print.h uses members of struct drm_device pointers, as
s
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
> Quoting Jani Nikula (2025-01-23 12:14:31-03:00)
>>On Thu, 23 Jan 2025, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> From: Gustavo Sousa
>>>
>>> The header drm_print.h uses members of struct drm_device pointers, as
>>> such, it should include drm_device.h to let the compiler
Quoting Jani Nikula (2025-01-23 12:14:31-03:00)
>On Thu, 23 Jan 2025, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> From: Gustavo Sousa
>>
>> The header drm_print.h uses members of struct drm_device pointers, as
>> such, it should include drm_device.h to let the compiler know the full
>> type definition.
>>
>> Without s
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025, Jani Nikula wrote:
> From: Gustavo Sousa
>
> The header drm_print.h uses members of struct drm_device pointers, as
> such, it should include drm_device.h to let the compiler know the full
> type definition.
>
> Without such include, users of drm_print.h that don't explicitly
From: Gustavo Sousa
The header drm_print.h uses members of struct drm_device pointers, as
such, it should include drm_device.h to let the compiler know the full
type definition.
Without such include, users of drm_print.h that don't explicitly need
drm_device.h would bump into build errors and be
