Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-11 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 16:20:37 +0100 Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 03:59:46PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 13:25:22 +0100 > > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 10:08:28AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > > On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 15:27:

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-08 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 03:59:46PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 13:25:22 +0100 > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 10:08:28AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 15:27:33 +0100 > > > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 05, 202

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-08 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 13:25:22 +0100 Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 10:08:28AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 15:27:33 +0100 > > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:51:06AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:17

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-08 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 10:08:28AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 15:27:33 +0100 > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:51:06AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:17:06 +0100 > > > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > > > > The current docume

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-08 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 15:27:33 +0100 Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:51:06AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:17:06 +0100 > > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > > The current documentation of drm_atomic_state says that it's the "global > > > state object". This

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 01:17:06PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > The current documentation of drm_atomic_state says that it's the "global > state object". This is confusing since, while it does contain all the > objects affected by an update and their respective states, if an object > isn't affecte

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-07 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:51:06AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:17:06 +0100 > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > The current documentation of drm_atomic_state says that it's the "global > > state object". This is confusing since, while it does contain all the > > objects affected

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-07 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 11:15:29AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:51:06 +0200 > Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:17:06 +0100 > > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > > The current documentation of drm_atomic_state says that it's the "global > > > state object". T

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-05 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:51:06 +0200 Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:17:06 +0100 > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > The current documentation of drm_atomic_state says that it's the "global > > state object". This is confusing since, while it does contain all the > > objects affected by an

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-05 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:17:06 +0100 Maxime Ripard wrote: > The current documentation of drm_atomic_state says that it's the "global > state object". This is confusing since, while it does contain all the > objects affected by an update and their respective states, if an object > isn't affected by

[PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-04 Thread Maxime Ripard
The current documentation of drm_atomic_state says that it's the "global state object". This is confusing since, while it does contain all the objects affected by an update and their respective states, if an object isn't affected by this update it won't be part of it. Thus, it's not truly a "globa