On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:57:08AM -0500, Jan Vesely wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 12:42 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > We really have to do this to avoid surprises when extending the ABI
> > later on. Especially when growing the structures.
> >
> > A bit overkill to update all the old legacy io
On 11 February 2015 at 11:42, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> We really have to do this to avoid surprises when extending the ABI
> later on. Especially when growing the structures.
>
> A bit overkill to update all the old legacy ioctl wrappers, but can't
> hurt really either.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vet
We really have to do this to avoid surprises when extending the ABI
later on. Especially when growing the structures.
A bit overkill to update all the old legacy ioctl wrappers, but can't
hurt really either.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
---
xf86drm.c | 112 ++
On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 12:42 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> We really have to do this to avoid surprises when extending the ABI
> later on. Especially when growing the structures.
>
> A bit overkill to update all the old legacy ioctl wrappers, but can't
> hurt really either.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dani