Hi Laurent
Thank you for the review
> > From DT point of view, in general, drivers should be asking for a
> > specific port number because their function is fixed in the binding.
> >
> > of_graph_get_next_endpoint() doesn't match to this concept.
> >
> > Simply replace
> >
> > - of_graph
Hi Morimoto-san,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 02:55:45AM +, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> From DT point of view, in general, drivers should be asking for a
> specific port number because their function is fixed in the binding.
>
> of_graph_get_next_endpoint() doesn't match t
>From DT point of view, in general, drivers should be asking for a
specific port number because their function is fixed in the binding.
of_graph_get_next_endpoint() doesn't match to this concept.
Simply replace
- of_graph_get_next_endpoint(xxx, NULL);
+ of_graph_get_endpoint_by_r
